<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Constrained Bliss Point &#187; belief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/tag/belief/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com</link>
	<description>where the social welfare function meets the grand utility possibilities frontier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Inconsistency</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/09/inconsistency/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/09/inconsistency/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 17:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerditry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[belief systems]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consistency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[formal system]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grey area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hypocrisy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=397</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why do people place so much value on consistent systems of beliefs?
In a formal system, sure, you want consistency. If a formal system is inconsistent then you can use it to prove anything &#8212; it&#8217;s effectively useless. But our minds are not formal systems. Humans don&#8217;t exist simply to prove things (unless you&#8217;re a mathematician [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do people place so much value on consistent systems of beliefs?</p>
<p>In a formal system, sure, you want consistency. If a formal system is inconsistent then you can use it to prove anything &#8212; it&#8217;s effectively useless. But our minds are not formal systems. Humans don&#8217;t exist simply to prove things (unless you&#8217;re a mathematician I guess).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s say you believe two contradictory axioms. What&#8217;s to stop you from voluntarily relaxing one or the other as the situation demands? I suppose then you aren&#8217;t being &#8220;principled&#8221;. Your choice may seem arbitrary, and lead to arbitrary results. But it could be that you don&#8217;t <em>know</em> what you should believe, until you&#8217;re faced with a difficult situation that stretches your belief system. Life is full of gray areas. Sometimes you just do what you think is best, and reform your belief system later to compensate.</p>
<p>Many consider hypocrisy a vice. I used to feel the same way, until I questioned that assumption and couldn&#8217;t provide a good justification. Let&#8217;s say I get mad at a house mate for not cleaning up his dishes, and then I go ahead and leave my dirty dishes in the sink. He has every right to get mad at me, assuming he doesn&#8217;t like dirty dishes left in the sink. But should it be any worse that I&#8217;m violating my own rules, in addition to his? I am not so certain.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m very willing to hear counter arguments, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/09/inconsistency/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

