<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Constrained Bliss Point &#187; Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/tag/language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com</link>
	<description>where the social welfare function meets the grand utility possibilities frontier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Linguistic engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bigotry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[het]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heteronormativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years I have come to realize the importance of language. Language not only expresses thought: it shapes thought. So what does it say when a popular term used as a jocular disparagement is also a synonym for &#8220;homosexual&#8221;? The vernacular shouldn&#8217;t be a place to perpetuate hatefulness.
My design sense kicked in, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few years I have come to realize the importance of language. Language not only expresses thought: <a title="Sapir-Whorf hypothesis" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapir%E2%80%93Whorf_hypothesis">it shapes thought</a>. So what does it say when a popular term used as a jocular disparagement is also a synonym for &#8220;homosexual&#8221;? The vernacular shouldn&#8217;t be a place to perpetuate hatefulness.</p>
<p>My design sense kicked in, against my better judgment: I need a new word, usable in the same context, which doesn&#8217;t have any bigoted overtones. Wait &#8212; better &#8212; a word which specifically flips the nuance to be disparaging toward heterosexuals. Then we get satire and linguistic engineering for the price of one.</p>
<p>And so, friends, let us henceforth banish the terms &#8220;gay&#8221; and &#8220;fag&#8221; from our discourse, and replace them with &#8220;het&#8221; (a term derived, for those of you keeping score, from &#8220;heterosexual&#8221;).</p>
<p>Bring it back. Fight heteronormativity.</p>
<p><em>End note: my friends and I tried this back at RPI. Needless to say, it did not catch on, which is for the best. From now on I&#8217;m leaving language to natural selection. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Grammatically-correct songs</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/grammatically-correct-songs/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/grammatically-correct-songs/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 14:05:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Muzak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nerditry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grammar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lie]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[songs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[usage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=182</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a nerd for grammar, among other things. I think English has somewhat complex grammatical rules for a reason, and that systematic mistakes in usage should not be tolerated. I&#8217;ve prided myself on knowing the corner cases of language ever since I became self-aware.
For example, farther and further are mostly interchangeable, but they are [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a nerd for grammar, among other things. I think English has somewhat complex grammatical rules for a reason, and that systematic mistakes in usage should not be tolerated. I&#8217;ve prided myself on knowing the corner cases of language ever since I became self-aware.</p>
<p>For example, <em>farther </em>and <em>further</em> are mostly interchangeable, but they are subtly different. For example, <em>farther</em> should be used with measures of distance, whereas <em>further</em> is for measures of degree or time; <em>further</em> is also used as the <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/Appendix:Glossary#comparative">comparative</a> form of <em>far</em>. Although Wiktionary <a href="http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/further">tells me</a> that experts have never made a fuss about this distinction, I tend to err on the side of grammar nerditry.</p>
<p>Songs are different than regular usage, though. Grammatical constraints are often relaxed or broken for artistic effect or because of the exigency of other types of constraints. It used to irk me when artists would use the improper form of <em>lay</em> or <em>lie</em> in their songs, until I thought of how weird it would sound to use the correct form. At the same time, I have the utmost respect for artists who navigate treacherous grammatical straits properly and elegantly.</p>
<p>Quick grammar lesson: <em>to lay</em> is transitive, as in &#8220;I lay the book down on the table.&#8221; <em>To lie </em>is intransitive, as in &#8220;I lie down on the couch to take a nap.&#8221; The confusion arises because the past tense of <em>lie</em> is <em>lay</em>. I lie / I lay / I had lain. I lay / I laid / I had laid. I&#8217;ll try not to judge you for getting this wrong.</p>
<p>A recent example is <a href="http://www.thebirdandthebee.com/">The Bird &amp; The Bee</a>&#8217;s <a href="http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&amp;videoid=48468475"><em>Love Letter to Japan</em></a>: &#8220;and now, all my heart I will lay down precisely at your feet&#8221;. The present tense of <em>to lay</em>. The transitive one. Perfect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/grammatically-correct-songs/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

