<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Constrained Bliss Point &#187; lists</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/tag/lists/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com</link>
	<description>where the social welfare function meets the grand utility possibilities frontier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 22:16:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Optimal to-do list size</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2010/01/optimal-to-do-list-size/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2010/01/optimal-to-do-list-size/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 01:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[GTD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Getting Things Done]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[to-do]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=618</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a list-maker. I enjoy making lists. Getting Things Done (GTD) utilizes lists heavily, and I also enjoy GTD. I&#8217;m not sure which way the correlation runs between those two facts. But not all lists are created equal. I think there are very important constraints on the sizes of to-do lists, Next Action lists, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a list-maker. I enjoy making lists. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Getting_Things_Done">Getting Things Done</a> (GTD) utilizes lists heavily, and I also enjoy GTD. I&#8217;m not sure which way the correlation runs between those two facts. But not all lists are created equal. I think there are very important constraints on the sizes of to-do lists, Next Action lists, and Projects lists, to name a few. For the differences among these types, GTD&#8217;s Wikipedia article is a great read &#8212; if you don&#8217;t care for the distinctions, just think of your own to-do list (and if you don&#8217;t utilize a to-do list, may God have mercy on you).</p>
<p>Lists cannot be too long, if you are going to use them effectively. How many times have you created a to-do list for yourself, and everything was going fine for a few days, until eventually you got bogged down and started procrastinating? I find it incredibly easy to convince myself that, paradoxically, I have so many things to do that I might as well not do any of them. This does not bode well for productivity.</p>
<p>Over the last half of last year, I stopped seeing myself as a task-completing machine, who should optimize his throughput of actions for maximal efficiency. I realized that it wasn&#8217;t making me any happier, just checking more things off my list, since the other half of the time I was hiding from the morass of tasks. Yet again I&#8217;ve remembered that lists are merely tools for being an effective person.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s important to keep perspective as you go through life &#8212; otherwise you might end up in the wrong place. I realized that it&#8217;s not important what actions I complete; it is only important where they are getting me. So, I still use the GTD system, but with a few caveats:</p>
<ul>
<li>I keep a short list, on my whiteboard, of the tasks I should finish ASAP.</li>
<li>I make sure this list doesn&#8217;t exceed ten or so items.</li>
<li>I don&#8217;t let any item sit on the list too long: complete it or scrub it.</li>
<li>If I let the whole list sit for too long, I have to finish as many actions as possible in the next free moment I get.</li>
<li>If the whole list gets stale, I throw it out and start over. They obviously weren&#8217;t the right tasks anyway.</li>
<li>I warehouse tasks not important enough for my whiteboard list on my Next Actions list.</li>
<li>I review my Next Actions list periodically to see if any actions should be whiteboarded. Stale actions get thrown out.</li>
</ul>
<p>The key change I&#8217;ve seen is that my lists are much, much smaller. Constant pruning of my Next Actions list has kept it under 15 items for a few months now. And I&#8217;ve never felt better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2010/01/optimal-to-do-list-size/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
