<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Constrained Bliss Point &#187; MBTI</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/tag/mbti/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com</link>
	<description>where the social welfare function meets the grand utility possibilities frontier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Why I like economics</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/10/why-i-like-economics/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/10/why-i-like-economics/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Economics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[axioms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[intuition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maths]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MBTI]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;m an intuitive person: I&#8217;m more concerned with broad-reaching theories than with any particular instantiation of fact. I scored a solid N on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator. That&#8217;s not to say I don&#8217;t like facts. On the contrary, theories need to be generalized from somewhere, and starting with the known state of the world is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m an intuitive person: I&#8217;m more concerned with broad-reaching theories than with any particular instantiation of fact. I scored a solid N on the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Myers-Briggs_Type_Indicator">Myers-Briggs Type Indicator</a>. That&#8217;s not to say I don&#8217;t like facts. On the contrary, theories need to be generalized from <em>somewhere</em>, and starting with the known state of the world is common sense. But I don&#8217;t operate in Sensing-land &#8212; I need to be able to clearly see the general pattern in order to understand something.</p>
<p>Framed this way, I like economics for the same reason I like engineering. The extensive maths used in both fields are a means of grounding one&#8217;s intuition in something substantial, something provable. Maths allow one to derive, from a set of axioms and real-world data, a bunch of consistent theorems, equations, etc. that describe the system the axioms (and data) generate. If your intuition clashes with your results, either you&#8217;re wrong or you made a math mistake. Here you have a very solid check to balance out your intuition.</p>
<p>This allows me to satisfy two competing objectives: first, I don&#8217;t want to spend all my time in math land; second, I don&#8217;t want my intuitions to be wildly off base. So I ponder my intuition, I learn the requisite maths, and then I can go write a bunch of equations to ensure that my intuition is correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/10/why-i-like-economics/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

