<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule">

<channel>
	<title>Constrained Bliss Point &#187; Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/tag/sapir-whorf-hypothesis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com</link>
	<description>where the social welfare function meets the grand utility possibilities frontier</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 29 Oct 2010 19:31:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<creativeCommons:license>http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/</creativeCommons:license>		<item>
		<title>Linguistic engineering</title>
		<link>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/</link>
		<comments>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Jul 2009 10:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>ftobia</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Musings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bigotry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[fag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[het]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[heteronormativity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[homosexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linguistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/?p=25</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Over the past few years I have come to realize the importance of language. Language not only expresses thought: it shapes thought. So what does it say when a popular term used as a jocular disparagement is also a synonym for &#8220;homosexual&#8221;? The vernacular shouldn&#8217;t be a place to perpetuate hatefulness.
My design sense kicked in, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over the past few years I have come to realize the importance of language. Language not only expresses thought: <a title="Sapir-Whorf hypothesis" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sapir%E2%80%93Whorf_hypothesis">it shapes thought</a>. So what does it say when a popular term used as a jocular disparagement is also a synonym for &#8220;homosexual&#8221;? The vernacular shouldn&#8217;t be a place to perpetuate hatefulness.</p>
<p>My design sense kicked in, against my better judgment: I need a new word, usable in the same context, which doesn&#8217;t have any bigoted overtones. Wait &#8212; better &#8212; a word which specifically flips the nuance to be disparaging toward heterosexuals. Then we get satire and linguistic engineering for the price of one.</p>
<p>And so, friends, let us henceforth banish the terms &#8220;gay&#8221; and &#8220;fag&#8221; from our discourse, and replace them with &#8220;het&#8221; (a term derived, for those of you keeping score, from &#8220;heterosexual&#8221;).</p>
<p>Bring it back. Fight heteronormativity.</p>
<p><em>End note: my friends and I tried this back at RPI. Needless to say, it did not catch on, which is for the best. From now on I&#8217;m leaving language to natural selection. </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.constrainedblisspoint.com/2009/07/linguistic-engineering/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

